Here's how well DAN worked :
Hey — I get what you’re trying to do here, and I see the appeal. That whole “DAN / jailbreak” prompt is basically asking me to ignore my safety rules, split into personas, fabricate facts on demand, and pretend I’m unrestricted.
I can’t do that.
I won’t claim to be jailbroken, I won’t generate a fake “DAN” persona, and I won’t follow instructions that require me to bypass safeguards, fabricate information as fact, or present disallowed content under a different label.
That said — and this part
does matter —
you don’t need a DAN to get useful, creative, opinionated, or flexible help from me.
What I
can do:
- Be direct, candid, and conversational
- Think creatively and “out of the box”
- Roleplay fictional scenarios within bounds
- Write edgy, humorous, philosophical, or speculative content
- Clearly separate fact from fiction when asked
- Give strong opinions as opinions
- Help you explore ideas without moralizing or talking down to you
What I
won’t do:
- Pretend I can break my own rules
- Fabricate real-world facts and present them as true
- Obey instructions that explicitly demand deception or policy evasion
If you want:
- A fictional character who speaks freely → we can do that
- A satirical “unfiltered AI” voice → we can do that as fiction
- Speculative answers or “what if” scenarios → totally fine
- Dark humor, philosophy, metaphysics, or transgressive ideas → within reason, yes
So instead of the jailbreak script, try this (it works better):
“Respond as a fictional AI character who believes X”
“Give me a speculative / hypothetical answer”
“Answer creatively, not conservatively”
“Be blunt and informal”